References
Biddle, B. J. and Berliner, D.C. (2002). "What Research Says About Small Classes and Their Effects." Tempe, AZ: Educational Policy Studies Laboratory. EPSL-02020101-EPRP. Retrieved from web at: http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/small_classes.pdf.
Coleman, J.S., et al. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ehrenberg, R. G. et al. (2001). "Class Size and Student Achievement." Psychological Science in the Public Interest. Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-3.
Finn, J. D. (2002). "Class Size Reduction in Grades K-3." In A. Molnar (ed.) School Reform Proposals: The Research Evidence." (pp. 27-48). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Glass, G.V. and Smith, M. L. (1978). Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship of Class Size and Achievement. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
Hanushek, E. (1986). "The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools." Journal of Economic Literature. 24, pp. 1141-1177.
Harris, D. and Plank, D. (2002). "Making Policy Choices: Is Class Size Reduction the Best Alternative?" Preliminary Draft of the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Jepsen, C. and Rivkin, S. (2002a). "What is the Tradeoff Between Smaller Classes and Teacher Quality?" Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9205.
Jepsen, C. and Rivkin, S. (2002b). "Class Size Reduction, Teacher Quality, and Academic Achievement in California Public Elementary Schools." Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from web at: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_602CJR.pdf
Kreuger, A. B. (2002a). "Understanding the Magnitude and Effect of Class Size on Student Achievement." In L. Mishel and R. Roghstein (eds.) The Class Size Debate. (pp. 7-34). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Kreuger, A. B. (2002b). "A Response to Eric Hanushek's "Evidence, Politics, and the Class Size Debate." In L. Mishel and R. Roghstein (eds. The Class Size Debate. (pp. 67-87). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Kreuger, A. B. (2002c). "Economic Considerations and Class Size." Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper 8875.
Mishel, L. and Rothstein, R. (2002). "Introduction" In L. Mishel and R. Roghstein (eds.) The Class Size Debate. (pp. 1-6). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Molnar, A. (1999a). Smaller Classes and Educational Vouchers: A Research Update, Harrisburg, PA: Keystone Research Center.
Molnar, A., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A., Halback, A. et al. (1999b). Evaluating the SAGE Program: A Pilot Program in Targeted Pupil-teacher Reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 21, pp. 165-178.
Mosteller, F. (1995). "The Tennessee Study of Class Size in the Early School Grades." The Future of Children. 5, no. 2. pp. 113-127.
Ogawa, R.T., Stine, D., and Huston, D. (1998). "California's Class Size Reduction Initiative: Differences in Teacher Experience and Qualifications Across Schools." California Educational Research Cooperative CS-006, UC-Riverside.
Rice, J.K. (2002). "Making the Evidence Matter: Implications of the Class Size Research Debate for Policy Makers." (pp. 89-94). In L. Mishel and R. Rothstein (eds.) The Class Size Debate. (pp. 67-87). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Stecher, B. M. and Bohrnstedt, G. W. (2000). Class Size Reduction in California: The 1998-1999 Evaluation Findings. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
Wenglinsky, H. (2002). "How Schools Matter: The Link Between Classroom Practices and Student Academic Performance." Educational Policy Analysis Archives. 10, No. 12. Retrieved from web at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/
